Sunday, March 1, 2009

Rush Limbaugh. What a Guy.


Conservative talk radio king and overrated windbag Rush Limbaugh, looking more bloated than ever (if that is at all possible), delivered the nationally televised keynote speech to close out the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington on Saturday. It was an interesting move for the conference, but not a senseless one. Limbaugh has recently been touted by some since the election as the face of the conservative right despite his undeniably polarizing persona. The speech was proudly proclaimed by the unctuously giddy Limbaugh as his “first national address” as it was broadcast nationwide on Fox News. Rush ran more than an hour over his allotted time of twenty minutes (which would seem to contradict Limbaugh’s insistence that contrary to popular belief he is neither pompous nor arrogant) and was seemingly well received.
In an unusual move for the generally partisan pundit, Limbaugh gave President Obama his due credit as a gifted politician while at the same time lamenting the way in which Obama is using his political and oratorical talents and new influence as President. However, one would never know that Limbaugh admired the President as a politician or in any other capacity for that matter by looking at Rush’s website. Headlines run the gamut from labeling Obama as a socialist to outright exclaiming the talk show host’s hope that the president will fail, all bordered by advertisements for Rush’s oh so clever “Club Gitmo” souvenir line.
Along with his usual venomous anti-liberal barbs, Limbaugh tried to inject some excitement and hope into the wounded conservative crowd as he looked four years into the future and commented on the need for conservatives to pick the right candidate to represent their true ideals in the 2012 election and re-claim the white house. Though he named no suitable candidate, he has recently made a point on his radio program of defending Republican Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal from liberal and especially conservative criticism in the wake of his response to President Obama’s speech to congress. Limbaugh cautioned conservatives away from criticisms of Jindal whom he claimed truly speaks for conservative beliefs, regardless of whether conservatives approve of the manner in which he does so.
Rush is not subtle regarding his admiration for the young governor who has become a rising star within the Republican ranks and drawn comparisons as a conservative answer to the President. The transcript for the radio segment which aired last week during which he defended him while also shouting his praises is labeled on his website under the title "Why We Love Bobby Jindal". While dismissing President Obama’s speech as “meaningless” and filled with “all kinds of lies” “El Rushbo” as he likes to refer to himself, made excuses for any faults in Jindal’s speech and gushed about the promise the young politician has shown both in his speech and his political actions.
Whether or not Rush has become the face of the conservative right by default, there is nothing new about him. Rush’s act has been pretty much the same for two decades now. He has been one of the top rated talk radio hosts, conservative or otherwise for years but conservative politicians tend to keep him at arms length due to his loose cannon image and reputation for off color remarks. His first “national address” may simply signal the feeling of desperation that has taken hold of the right since Obama’s election. It also seems like no coincidence that left wing media members are the first to proclaim the controversial Limbaugh as the new leader of the Republican party. I'm sure liberals are more than happy to have someone as potentially cancerous as Limbaugh representthe opposition. As for rush, he seems to be relishing the new post assigned to him whomever it is coming from. He certainly seems to have thrown his influence behind Bobby Jindal, but only time will tell whether that will ultimately help or harm any aspirations the Louisiana Governor may have in regards to the presidency.

8 comments:

  1. If Bobby Jindal wants to be seen as a serious politician aspiring to a more prominent position, he needs to break free from Rush Limbaugh. The problem is that Jindal can not completely distance himself from Limbaugh until he has built a national following. Jindal’s speech gave him an opportunity to start building that and it was a shrewd move by the Republicans. Democrats will need to keep an eye on him. I enjoyed reading your blog. The format is great.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that your post has a good format. Along with a comfortable flow and natural voice. It's nice to see you've taken a position.

    Aesthetically the black backround and sinister Rush image work great together. I'd vote for a nicer tie on Limbaugh, but thats the republicans problem.

    A good follow up entry could be discussing the conspiracy theory that Paul Baghalla, Rahm Emmanuel, and James Carville among others are porposely framing Rush as the defacto leader of the GOP, because research shows the negative response Limbaugh gets from all but his 20 million drone listeners.

    Please excuse my typing, I'd normally proof my comment on MSWord, but I'm using the school computer in the hall on the 7th floor and it doesn't like running two programs at once.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting post. It seems especially relevant given the turmoil over the last few weeks involving RNC Chairman Michael Steele. By denouncing & then quickly apologizing to "el Rusho" (a strange nickname for a man who has taken some intense stances on English as the official language for the US), Steele shows Limbaugh holds a considerable grip on power in the Republican party. I mean, he forced their highest leader to backtrack in a matter of days (or was it hours?).

    The last four years of RNC members distancing themselves from Rush are over. With a Dem-controlled government, Conservative radio hosts no longer have to deal with defending Bush, and can focus all their attention on attacks and trumpeting new knights of the Rep. Party and as such play an increasingly important role. The spotlight is momentarily off the Republicans, and I'll bet they'll seize the moment to gather in the dark.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder what rush has in mind by attempting to debate president Obama. Does he think if he defeats him, security would come from back stage and strip Obama from his only pair of keys to the white house and give it to him. I doubt it. At the end of the day rush is a flat out racist whom just cant accept that Barack Obama, a black man, holds the most prestigious position in the county. He was racist when he commented on Sunday night football about Donovan McNabb and he will always be a racist in my mind. He should stop praising Jindal and attempt to run for president himself. Because at the end of the day that’s all he really his in mind. Lets see how far that goes.


    Good Post
    Ali

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post! I agree that the photo and the black background work perfectly together. (I'm sure Rush himself would approve.) It is really fascinating to watch the GOP try to reconstruct its image by repackaging its existing stars. Rush Limbaugh has been a mainstay in our culture for as long as I can remember, but it is easy to forget that real people actually do admire and follow him. It will be interesting to see whether he proves to be an asset to his party, or if RL's divisive politics will hurt the conservatives in the long run. Only time will tell, but I imagine that he is more interested in adding to his already massive fortune by stirring up publicity for himself than putting a Republican in the White House.
    I think you have enough material to do an entire Rush Limbaugh themed blog!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think this is a really good post. You managed to get a lot of information in here without making it boring. It is very well organized. I like that you gave background information so that any one can read this any understand, even if they are not familiar with Limbaugh. You put his speech into context instead of just giving a summary which makes for a better post.
    Keep it up,
    Ina

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your blog visually is very well constructed, and your use of pictures and embedded links is great. I also think that you did a nice job of combining opinion commentary and information in this post. One thing that I think could be added here is that you could make the "media and politics" theme a little more prominent on this topic. Limbaugh is clearly a major media figure, but perhaps you could offer some more commentary on the subject using class concepts. One way of doing this might be related to something that I believe Salim has brought up in the comments here, which is this notion of why the Republican Party can embrace a figure who represents a very particular form of media now, whereas they really couldn't a few years ago. What political conditions are conducive to more polarizing, niche partisan media personalities becoming spokespeople for a major political party? Anyway, that is just one idea for how to make the media more central here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. this blog was updated 5/7/09 at 7pm

    ReplyDelete